|
17 October 2011 |
| http://gsn.nti.org/gsn/nw_20111017_9683.php |
|
"We already have a
general understanding of what should be done," a senior Kremlin official
said in an interview with the Kommersant newspaper. "Our response
will not cost us much, but it will be extremely effective."
The newspaper said the Obama administration has
formally rejected Moscow's repeated requests to provide a legally
enforceable pledge that U.S. missile interceptors deployed in Europe would
not be aimed at Russia's long-range strategic weapons. Russia has demanded
such an agreement as part of negotiations over its potential participation
in the missile shield.
The United States intends through 2020 to deploy
increasingly capable land- and sea-based missile interceptors around
Europe as a stated hedge against a potential ballistic missile attack from
the Middle East. That "phased adaptive approach" is to form the backbone
of a wider NATO effort to coordinate and augment individual member
nations' antimissile programs.
Washington has announced deals under which Romania,
Poland, Spain and Turkey would host missile defense elements on their
territories.
"Americans' intentions are getting more obvious:
they plan to build a missile defense system, but they are not going to
heed our opinion," the Kremlin source said.
Even if Washington changed course on the legal
pledge, "it would not suit us because these guarantees will be valid only
five years or so, and the next U.S. president after Obama could very well
abandon them" (Interfax I, Oct. 14).
A meeting between officials led by by U.S.
Undersecretary of State Ellen Tauscher and Russian Deputy Foreign Minister
Sergei Ryabkov last week ended without resolving significant issues in the
missile shield dispute, Interfax reported.
Though the negotiating teams held in-depth talks
about a variety of missile defense matters, including a "step-by-step
adaptive approach" for establishing a European antimissile system, key
points of contention were left unresolved, the Russian Foreign Ministry
said (Interfax II, Oct. 13). |
|
|